Debate participant who claims they couldn't see someone's name and asserts intellectual superiority
A philosophical discussion exploring whether moral principles can be quantified and measured like physical phenomena such as temperature.
A chaotic debate segment where participants argue about being able to see someone's name on screen, with heated exchanges and defensive positioning.
“I'm going to smoke some weed and I'm going laugh about everything even if it's not funny. So, just give me a minute.”
“fire was always hot right fire is probably always been hot”
“morals in the [ __ ] 14th century and you know like middle ages Spain are very different than modern Spain”
“But what the [ __ ] about abstract ideas that change with time? Those are not the same, mate.”
“I'm 10 steps ahead of you.”
“I won that one. Let's get to the second one.”
“Jokes are subjective. Comedy is subjective.”
“Hey. It was a distasteful joke. And my jokes aren't for everybody. My bad. That it was in your expense.”
CULTCODEX
