The episode analyzes a live broadcast where creator Alexandra Mayers issued specific, actionable threats against Psyche and others while grieving her father's death, examining how personal trauma was weaponized into criminal intimidation through proximity threats, doxxing plans, and coordinated harassment campaigns.
/// initiate_layer
Observers see the surface.
/// within ∞ The Current
Browse era →Summary
The episode opens with a scripted analysis ▶ 10:27 describing how digital disputes cross into criminal intimidation when creators issue specific physical threats. It details a broadcast where a creator (identified as Alexandra Mayers/AM) mourning her father's hospice death ▶ 11:07 and feeling financially exploited after sending $1,000+ in equipment ▶ 11:20 escalated from venting to declaring she wanted to 'track these individuals down and beat the living hell out of them' ▶ 11:35 and described facing the electric chair for murder ▶ 11:43. The analysis outlines proximity threats: AM named specific locations including a local McDonald's and liquor store ▶ 12:15 and planned to dox family members in law enforcement ▶ 12:28. It describes weaponizing authority by directing followers to file coordinated reports with Redondo Beach Police ▶ 12:38. The psychological framework is dissected: minimizing legal risk ▶ 13:04, using trauma as justification ▶ 13:14, and reframing premeditated violence as self-defense via stand-your-ground laws ▶ 13:27. At ▶ 15:18 the hosts pause the audio and begin live discussion. Two analysts examine AM's identity as 'impenetrable survivor' ▶ 15:39 and how grief-induced cognitive dissonance rewrote the narrative from 'I was vulnerable' to 'I was maliciously preyed upon' ▶ 16:47. They debate the line between valid anger and criminal escalation ▶ 17:19, concluding the boundary is crossed when expression seeks 'destruction of the other person's reality' ▶ 18:04. They detail specific threats against Psyche: 'kick his ass,' 'solid punch directly in the face' ▶ 18:43, and 'hopes he drops dead' ▶ 18:51. The analysts identify proximity and permanence as core psychological warfare tactics ▶ 19:38, explaining how AM mapped Psyche's real-world environment ▶ 20:09 to destroy the sanctuary of physical life ▶ 20:00.
This episode appears to function as both forensic documentation and meta-commentary on how live-streaming platforms transform personal crises into public evidence. The analysts' focus on the 'trauma shield' concept suggests a recurring show theme: the dangerous alchemy of genuine suffering and performative immunity. The dissection of identity threat — where a self-concept built on invulnerability cannot accommodate victimhood, so it generates aggression instead — continues the show's pattern of applying psychological frameworks to internet behavior without pathologizing. The conversation's devil's-advocate moment [16:56] where they validate the anger before condemning the escalation reflects the show's tendency to hold complexity rather than flatten into morality play. The emphasis on 'public ledger of intent' [14:43] reinforces a technological-materialist view: the platform itself archives the crime.
◈●●●HIGH AI-generated · summarizes on-stream discussion, not verified claims · methodology
Psyche opens with original songs about resilience and identity, then addresses ongoing conflicts with Beeta and Alexandra, discussing allegations, moderation decisions, and inviting affected parties to share their perspectives.
The host calls an emergency live stream claiming a nurse named Christine is threatening to misuse her medical access to have him institutionalized via a 'wellness check' or 'swat' call, presenting evidence of her past statements encouraging suicide and harm.
Psyche delivers a dramatic performance piece about seeing through manipulation and lies, followed by an open panel discussion addressing recent drama with other streamers including Sweet Pea.
Psyche hosts a celebration stream marking the permanent banning of Alexander McQueen and several other community members (Sig, 300 Glow, Saman, Eld, etc.), framing it as a strategic trap. The stream features guest appearances, AI-generated introduction songs, community drama discussions, and Psyche announcing a reduced streaming schedule.
Eldo reveals that Beeta has been doxxing multiple people, including Psyche and J-Dog, sharing their personal information on her platform while denying responsibility.
Psyche hosts a lengthy episode documenting threats of physical violence made by Alexandra Mayers (AM) during a livestream, featuring detailed analysis and audio/video evidence of threatening rhetoric directed at Psyche and others.
Explore the ideas at the heart of this episode
is built on arguments. Most of the time, digital beefs start and end as text on a screen or maybe raised voices on a live stream. This constant noise creates a false sense of security. A lot of creators treat the internet like a sandbox, a place where words float in a vacuum, completely disconnected from real world consequences. But there is a
strict invisible boundary. Venting frustration online is legal. Documented criminal intimidation is not. The moment a creator crosses that line, the situation instantly leaves the digital arena. They step directly into the crosshairs of the justice system. Take a recent live broadcast involving a creator dealing with profound personal
grief. She was mourning the traumatic loss of her father and compounding that pain was a deep festering frustration over an online pier. The dispute centered on money. She detailed sending unrecrocated donations plus over $1,000 in physical equipment like a microphone and tripod leaving her feeling exploited. The broadcast began as a
complaint about that exploited generosity. Then the tone shifted. She issued specific ultimatums, telling her audience she wanted to track these individuals down and beat the living hell out of them. Even describing an extreme scenario of facing the electric chair for murder. Leveraging a public platform to weaponize personal pain
breaks every boundary. The creator goes from being a legitimately a graved psychological weapon. It is a systematic effort to bridge the gap between a computer screen and the physical street. In this specific broadcast, the creator outlined what are known as proximity
threats. She detailed plans to disrupt her targets daily routines, promising to confront him at his local McDonald's and his neighborhood liquor store with the explicit goal of forcing him to move out of his home. The intimidation quickly expanded to collateral damage. She announced intentions to dox his family members, specifically noting plans to
target relatives working in law enforcement. This leads to the tactic of weaponizing authority. Creators will encourage their live followers to make coordinated reports to local authorities like the Roondo Beach Police, hoping to harass their target by proxy. These highly specific targeted behaviors turn everyday storefronts and quiet neighborhoods into sites of permanent
fear. When that happens, the crime of intimidation is complete. To keep an audience on their side during a rant like this, perpetrators rely on a specific psychological framework. They actively minimize their own legal risk, assuring viewers that their actions will result in nothing more than a slap on the wrist. They also need a powerful
emotional justification. In this case, the creator leaned heavily on the severe trauma of holding her dying father's hand in hospice care. With the audience primed, the creator then co-ops actual legal concepts. She reframed premeditated preemptive violence as legitimate self-defense, explicitly citing stand your ground laws. This
leads to a chilling assumption. The creator told her stream that a jury would automatically acquit her of any violence simply because she had zero criminal history and was experiencing profound emotional distress. This creates a dangerous internal belief system. personal pain begins to function as a trauma shield, falsely convincing the individual that their suffering
grants them total moral and legal immunity. That perceived immunity shatters when it collides with the actual reality of the justice system. Profound grief, a difficult financial dispute, or a traumatic year offer absolutely no legal protection against charges of criminal intimidation. But the live digital environment actively
hides this reality. Co-hosts and chat rooms form an immediate echo chamber. Instead of deescalating the situation, they passively validate the hostility. That realtime audience validation provides a fatal illusion of safety. It tricks the perpetrator into confessing to crimes right in front of a live audience. A live broadcast feels
temporary while it's happening. The cold reality is that data is permanent and nobody is ever truly anonymous. What these creators actually build is a public ledger of intent. Every threat, detailed timeline, and physical location is permanently archived as actionable evidence. That data is seamlessly handed to law enforcement, converting digital
noise into a solid criminal case. There is a massive irony here. In the attempt to psychologically destroy another person's life, the creator completely documents their own guilt. Broadcasting threats of violence doesn't resolve a digital grievance. It permanently traps the creator in their own legal crosshairs.
>> Okay. Okay. Let's continue the uh let's continue the audio. One second.
Oopsie. Yeah, she is positioning herself as a hardened survivor. She is a woman who has endured immense societal judgment. Who has been knocked down by global corporate outsourcing and who has survived in the trenches of the sex work industry by being tougher, smarter, and more resilient than the people trying to exploit her.
>> The core of her presented identity is basically I am a woman who does not get taken advantage of. >> That's it. And that is the exact mechanism driving the escalation. >> Identity threat is one of the most powerful triggers for human aggression. When an individual constructs their entire self-concept around the idea of being an impenetrable, savvy survivor who never gets conned, any situation
that makes them feel conned threatens to collapse their entire psychological foundation. >> Add the extreme vulnerability of mourning her father and the cognitive dissonance just becomes unbearable. >> Totally. to admit that she freely gave away a $1,000 to an internet creator while she was grieving would mean admitting she was vulnerable, foolish, or seeking parasocial affection. >> And in her ego cannot process that.
>> No, it can't. Therefore, her psychological defense mechanism completely rewrites the narrative. She wasn't vulnerable. She was maliciously prayed upon by a master manipulator. >> I am going to push back on the judgment here for a second just to play devil's advocate and look at it from her perspective. >> Sure. If you are deep in the throws of fresh grief, I mean, you literally just
held your father's hand as he died and you truly deeply believe that you have been financially exploited by someone you viewed as a confidant. Isn't a massive explosion of anger entirely justified? >> Well, yes, the anger is, >> right? So, where is the actual line between a completely valid fiery venting session on a live stream and a dangerous criminal escalation? That is the
critical distinction we have to make because the emotion itself is not the crime. The feeling of absolute betrayal and the anger that stems from feeling financially exploited are entirely human and understandable. >> It is normal to be furious. >> Yeah. >> Yes. >> It is normal to complain to your friends or your audience about a perceived injustice. The boundary is not crossed by the internal feeling of anger.
>> Okay. So where does it cross over? The boundary is crossed when the expression of that internal pain morphs into an external actionable threat against someone else's physical safety. The line is crossed when you stop seeking validation for your feelings and start seeking the destruction of the other person's reality. >> And that brings us directly to the broadcast documented in the transcript.
Because AM did not just vent. She leveraged the live broadcast platform to weaponize her emotional pain, crossing from digital hostility into issuing incredibly graphic specific ultimatums. >> Let's look at the actual anatomy of these threats because it wasn't just vague name calling. >> No, the language captured in the source material is explicitly violent. AM told
her audience she wanted to quote beat the living hell out of a bunch of these people. >> She moved from general anger to specific physical promise. >> Exactly. She stated clearly that if she were to encounter Psyche in person, she would kick his ass and deliver a solid punch directly in the face. >> And she goes further than that. She says she hopes he drops dead. She creates
this hypothetical scenario where she says, "If I lose my freaking mind and I knock the living hell out of him," and then she immediately pivots into trying to justify why the courts would let her get away with it. >> The imagery is visceral. It's aggressive and it's designed to paint a picture of physical dominance over the target. But what really struck me in the source material is that the most terrifying
aspect of her campaign wasn't the threat of a punch in the face. >> No, it rarely is in these cases, >> right? It was the architectural nature of the psychological terror. >> Yes. When we analyze modern online harassment, the direct threat of a physicalation is often less damaging than the systematic dismantling of a targets sense of environmental safety. >> Like breaking down the walls of their actual life.
>> If they can't behave, they should be in prison. >> Utilized two highly effective tactics, psychological warfare, which are proximity and permanence. >> Let's break down proximity because this is where the internet bleeds into the physical world in a very scary way. >> Proximity is about destroying the illusion of distance. When someone is bullying you online, the instinct is to log off, close the laptop, and retreat
into your physical life. >> Your physical life is your sanctuary, >> right? But AM deliberately targeted that sanctuary. She didn't just issue a blanket threat. She mapped out his realworld environment, >> which is so calculated, >> very. She specifically named his local McDonald's. She identified his neighborhood liquor store on the broadcast. She explicitly told her
audience, "He's going to have a hard time going to that McDonald's in the future. He's going to have a hard time going anywhere. He's going to have to move." The stated goal of the harassment was forced relocation. She wanted to make him so terrified of his own neighborhood, so paranoid about just getting a cup of coffee or walking down the street that he would have to abandon his >> which is profound psychological abuse.
>> You know what this is? This is exactly how traditional siege warfare operates. Explain the mechanics of that analogy because I think it fits perfectly. >> Think about a medieval castle under siege. If an invading army realizes they cannot breach the castle walls directly, maybe the walls are too thick or a direct assault is too risky, they don't just pack up and go home, >> right? They change the tactics.
>> They change the environment entirely. They poison the local water supply. They burn the surrounding farms and fields. They cut off the supply lines. They basically salt the earth so nothing can >> Starve them out. Exactly. By targeting grow. the McDonald's, by naming the local liquor store, by broadcasting his daily walking routes to an angry mob, the aggressor is salting the earth of the
target's daily life. >> You aren't attacking the target directly. You're making the environment itself so hostile and toxic that the target cannot survive in it. >> That is a terrifying way to frame the mechanism of doxing. It is environmental poisoning. And the transcript shows that she expanded the siege warfare beyond just Psyche's personal routine. >> Yeah, she targeted the collateral structures of his life. She doxed his
family members. >> She repeatedly broadcasted the real legal names of his parents, Judy and Delos Bates. She issued threats regarding relatives he allegedly has working in law enforcement, stating she would create AI generated videos to target them. >> This is the tactic of isolation. If you make it dangerous for anyone to be associated with the target, the target becomes completely isolated.
>> And then we get to the ultimate escalation, the absolute pinnacle of proximity and permanence. She set up her stream title as a literal call to action directed at local authorities. >> This part is just staggering. >> The title of the broadcast literally instructed viewers to contact the Roondo Beach Police Department. She actively encouraged her audience to call the
police on Psyche's property, tell the cops there were illegal substances on the premises, and demand he be banned from social media. >> This brings us to the terrifying reality of swatting. For those who might not be familiar with the mechanics of this, swatting is the practice of making a fabricated, highstakes emergency call to emergency services, >> like claiming there's a hostage situation or a bomb threat.
>> Exactly. Or in this case, a major illegal drug operation. The goal is to deceive the police into dispatching a heavily armed SWAT team or rapid response unit to the target's address, >> which is incredibly dangerous. It is not >> Not at all. It is the weaponization of a prank. the state's monopoly on violence. When you tell a live audience of agitated
people to call the local police on a specific address regarding illegal substances, you are taking a digital grievance and actively attempting to manufacture a lethal realworld police encounter. People have been shot and killed in their own homes because of >> Many times, it is a potentially lethal swatting. >> This is what just breaks my brain. Most act. rational adults understand that
organizing an internet mob to harass a family and calling in false reports to the police is highly illegal. It crosses every moral and legal boundary. >> Right? >> So, how does someone sitting in front of a webcam justify this? How does AM rationalize orchestrating a siege and potential swatting while on stream? She achieves this by constructing a completely alternate legal and moral
reality, which is actually a very common psychological defense mechanism in high conflict digital spaces. >> We have to look at the warped justifications she uses to validate her actions right? >> Exactly. >> First, she engages in intense risk minimization. up. >> She repeatedly tells her viewers that because she possesses zero criminal
history, any physical assault she commits, any real world violence would result in a mere slap on the wrist from a judge. >> Wow. She convinces herself and her audience that the justice system will view her actions as a minor indiscretion rather than premeditated violence. >> And it gets worse. >> Yeah. She actually tries to invoke a specific legal doctrine to protect
herself, doesn't she? She mentions being located in Florida and explicitly talks about standing your ground. >> Yes. >> I want to pause here because this is a massive leap. >> How does someone try to use a self-defense law to justify tracking someone down across the country to punch them? It is the creation of a pseudo legal framework. Let's look at the actual mechanism of stand your ground laws. Historically,
these laws were designed to remove the duty to retreat if you are attacked in a place where you have a lawful right to be. So, if someone breaks into your home or attacks you on the street, >> right, with imminent severe lethal force, these laws state you can use force to defend yourself without having to try and run away first. That is the legal reality, >> right? It requires an imminent threat to
your physical safety. >> Exactly. What AM is doing is taking a law designed for immediate life or death self-defense and warping it to cover premeditated retaliation over an internet dispute. >> Hung up. She is attempting to reframe a preemptive retaliatory assault. You know, traveling to a different state to find someone at a McDonald's and attack them as legitimate self-defense. In her
constructed reality, the emotional harm she suffered over the microphone and cash app donations equates to physical danger, therefore giving her the legal right to strike first. It is fascinating and really terrifying how people on the internet become these amateur sovereign citizen style lawyers twisting statutes to soo their own conscience.
>> Because if you can convince yourself that the law is on your side, you completely bypass any moral hesitation. >> There's this incredibly dark moment detailed in the transcript where she maps out the consequences of her violence and she genuinely assumes a jury would acquit her. She says, quote, "If I knock the living hell out of him, I will be forgiven by the courts because of the circumstances."
>> She believes that her emotional trauma, the loss of her father, and her sense of betrayal grants her total immunity. And she extrapolates this fantasy even further into the absurd. >> Oh, the electric chair comment. >> Yes. She states that if she were to go totally crazy, commit an extreme act of violence, and end up in the electric chair for her actions, she would sit in the chair and say, "Job well done."
>> Job well done. sitting in the chair. That statement right there strips away all the pseudo legal justifications. >> It really does. >> That is a belief system where personal pain becomes the ultimate trump card. It is the belief that because I am hurting, nothing I do to you can be classified as a crime. I am the victim. Therefore, I
am the judge, jury, and executioner. >> It is absolute moral absolutism driven by perceived victimhood. But here is the sociological element that makes this case study so important. She did not arrive at this conclusion in isolation. >> She was not speaking into an empty >> Oh, Christine was right there to help her along. >> These live streams involve panners of
co-hosts and scrolling chat rooms filled with real people. The environment she was operating in actively facilitated, accelerated, and validated this >> This is the part of the source material behavior. that genuinely disturbed me. >> Oh, we know you're homeless. specifically two co-hosts on the panel >> woman named Christine and an individual called Black RG
>> because you read these transcripts you >> right see am talking about the electric chair doxing parents and calling the police and your immediate thought as a rational human being is surely someone sitting next to her on this panel is going to hit the brakes >> you'd think so >> someone is going to say hey let's dial it back you cannot talk about swatting people or doxing elderly parents but that intervention never happens
>> let's analyze Christine because her presence on this panel is the perfect case study for how digital environments warp real world morality. >> Based on the source material, how does Christine present herself to the audience? >> She presents herself as the absolute antithesis of an unhinged internet troll. The transcript details that Christine is a 42year-old married nurse.
>> Okay. A healthcare professional. >> Exactly. She has four sons. She has adult grandchildren. She constantly references her career in healthcare. She acts as this successful traditional maternal figure of authority. >> So, she's established this very stable persona. >> She is a grandmother working in a profession built entirely on empathy, care, and saving lives. And yet, she sits comfortably on a live broadcast
while threats of physical violence, swatting, and doxing are flying freely. >> So, how does a health care professional sit through a doxing session without >> It makes no sense on the surface. intervening? >> We have to understand the mechanics of digital tribalism known as polarization. the loser. >> When people join the digital community, they form an in-group >> and psyche becomes the out groupoup, >> right? The out group, in this case,
Psyche, is stripped of his humanity and reduced to an enemy avatar. Group polarization dictates that when individuals within a cohesive group discuss an issue, the collective behavior and decisions of the group become far more extreme than the initial individual inclinations of members. So Christine sitting alone in her living room might never independently decide to
dox a man's parents. >> Never. But inside the echo chamber surrounded by her tribe, the moral threshold lowers. >> Wow. Instead of deescalating, she actually provides vital emotional reinforcement to the aggressor. >> Yes. When am spiraling, talking about pushing things at the edge and acting violently, Christine doesn't assert her real world authority as a nurse to stop it. Instead, she offers theological
validation. Hello. >> Oh, I remembered this from the transcript. The transcript notes Christine saying she hope God will give AM a chance to go to heaven even if she is kind of bad at the end. >> She is literally giving AM a moral permission slip to commit violence. >> And the transcript reveals why she feels so aligned with AM. They bond over a very specific shared demographic grievance. They bond over being
successful older women who feel constantly disrespected by what they term failure to launch internet mails. >> That's a very specific resentment. It is. Christine specifically complains that these young men dislike her because she is a successful white American woman, a mother, and a professional. And they realize they can't manipulate her. >> They have forged an identity based on shared resentment.
By framing the conflict as successful women versus manipulative internet boys, they completely obscure the actual actions being taken. >> Doxing and swatting are no longer viewed >> No, they're viewed as righteous as crimes. discipline being handed down to an unruly subordinate class. This is how normal people justify atrocities. You know, they rewrite the target as deserving of the punishment
>> and the escalation within this tribe becomes incredibly toxic. The other panelist mentioned in the sources, Black RG, doesn't just sit quietly either. He actively contributes to the horror show by making a joke about finding a way to infect psyche with AIDS, >> which is a vile biological threat that is casually tossed into the conversation and it goes entirely unchecked by the
nurse on the panel. Right. It demonstrates the complete collapse of normal social boundaries. I want to dig deeper into the mechanism of why this happens specifically. >> I think we should report Christine >> because I understand group polarization but there is an active audience here. A live chat. >> This is a nurse. That is the variable. >> How does the presence of an audience change the psychology of the speakers? >> It's driven by a mechanism called
audience capture. A live stream chat acts like a digital Roman coliseum. The chat is constantly scrolling and it operates on an algorithmic and psychological dopamine loop, >> meaning it rewards the craziest behavior. >> Exactly. The chat rewards extremity. If a speaker is reasonable, calm, and attempts to deescalate a situation, the chat gets bored. The dopamine stops.
>> So, the UI itself incentivizes escalation. >> Precisely. If the speaker escalates the drama, validates the rage, and issues a threat, the chat explodes with validation, emojis, and sometimes financial donations. So for Christine, the audience is validating her identity as the wise, tough mother. To maintain that status, to keep the approval of the
mob, she must conform to the heightened emotional state of the room. >> Over time, the creator stops leading the audience and starts being led by the audience. They compromise their real world ethics to appease the digital tribe. The audience captures their morality. >> Which brings us to the devastating reality on the other side of the screen. We have spent time analyzing the aggressor, the enablers, the pseudo
legal justifications, and the dopamine loops of the echo chamber. But what is the actual psychological toll on the targeted individual? >> Right? What happens to the human being sitting alone in their room watching their daily life, their family, and their safety be systematically dismantled in real time for the entertainment of chat room? The sources provide a profound and deeply tragic look into Psyche's reaction. What makes
it so fascinating is the massive dissonance it highlights between the armor people wear on the internet and the inescapable vulnerability of their physical reality. >> Let's talk about that armor because Psyche's digital persona is incredibly stylized. >> Yeah, the transcript actually includes the intro to one of his videos and it reads like cyberpunk poetry. It is a
hyper stoic almost theatrical presentation of self. >> Who does he describe himself? >> He describes himself in the third person as the unreadable man, a phantom in the live stream glow. He claims he moves like smoke through chaos and declares that silence is the weapon. >> That's quite the persona. >> It paints a picture of a detached, emotionless hacker philosopher who
exists above the fray, observing the internet's madness without ever being touched by it. >> Why do people build avatars like that? They build them because the internet is a chaotic, terrifying space. That persona is a psychological bulletproof >> to make themselves feel immune. vest >> Exactly. If you convince yourself and everyone else that you are an unreadable
phantom, you feel immune to the insults. You feel untouchable. But the fatal flaw of a digital persona is that it only protects you from digital weapons. When the threats breach the screen, when they name your local McDonald's, when they publish your parents' real names, when they threaten to send the police to your physical door, the phantom vanishes instantly.
>> You are no longer moving like smoke. You are flesh and blood experiencing profound biological terror. >> And the raw reality captured in the subsequent streams shows that stoicism completely collapsing. He isn't reciting poetry anymore. He expresses this deep, raw, desperate confusion. >> What is he saying in those moments? The transcript notes him repeatedly stating,
"I didn't do anything to her." He is desperately trying to apply logic to a completely illogical siege. He is trying to figure out how a dispute over a microphone morphed into a death threat and his brain just can't bridge the gap. >> The psychological impact of having your physical environment targeted is the total erosion of your baseline reality. We talked about proximity earlier. When
your daily walk is threatened, your nervous system remains in a constant state of hyperarousal. >> You're just always on edge. >> Every time a car drives slowly past your house, every time there is an unexpected knock at the door, every time you walk into a store, your brain is scanning for the threat that was promised on the live stream. The digital anxiety becomes a physical symptom. You are held hostage
by anticipation. >> And the horror at the violation of his family's privacy is palpable. He talks about how they are flashing pictures of his parents dragging private elderly citizens into a toxic internet beef. >> It's the ultimate feeling of powerlessness watching the people you love be put in danger because of a screen in your bedroom. >> But there is one specific detail in the
transcript that made me stop reading. It is a detail so fundamentally dark that it forces you to re-evaluate the depths of online cruelty. It adds a layer of emotional devastation that makes the doxing pale in comparison. the revelation regarding the origin of their friendship. >> Yes. Psyche reveals that the core reason he and AM originally bonded the foundation of their entire connection
before the money, before the equipment, before the threats was a shared profound trauma. >> Psyche's father had also died in hospice >> What was it? a year prior. And just like am Psyche had sat by the bed and held his father's hand as he passed away. >> Wow. They share the exact same devastating life experience. They
recognized that raw grief in each other. It was an incredibly intimate, sacred point of connection. >> I want to just sit with that for a second. Imagine giving someone that piece of your soul. Imagine sharing the most painful, vulnerable moment of your entire life with someone because you think they understand. And then when a disagreement over a microphone happens, that person takes that sacred grief,
turns it into a weapon, and uses it to fuel a mob. to have them dox the photos of your deceased father to a scrolling chat room of people making AIDS jokes. >> The sense of betrayal there is absolute. >> It is taking the softest, most human part of a person and running it through a wood chipper for content. >> It is the ultimate violation of trust and it forces a very uncomfortable realization about the nature of the digital age
>> which is >> in a decentralized highly connected world. Anyone, a creator, a viewer, a normal person with a Facebook account can suddenly become the target of an online mob. The tools exist to weaponize any detail of your life. >> It begs the question, how do you survive when your deepest personal tragedies are
mocked and utilized by thousands of people to destroy your reality, >> which is the pivot point of this entire deep dive >> because the traditional advice for dealing with cyber bullying is archaic. >> Oh, totally. People say just log off, turn off the screen, walk away from the computer. >> But as we've established, you cannot log off when someone is telling an audience to call the police to your house. You cannot close your eyes when they are threatening your parents.
>> So, when the psychological pressure is absolute and the threats are entirely physical, how do you fight back? >> Passive hope is no longer a viable strategy for survival. Hoping the mob gets bored and moves on is dangerous. You have to actively rewrite the rules of engagement. You have to transition from a passive victim into an active archavist. You have to engage in aggressive digital self-defense.
>> Let's talk about the specific defensive tactics utilized by Psyche and his community because they didn't just sit back and take it, >> right? The transcript outlines a highly organized response centered around the absolute crucial role of archiving data. >> This is a critical paradigm shift in understanding internet behavior. When a person is screaming threats on a live
stream, it feels temporary to them. They are riding a wave of dopamine and rage, they say something horrible and then the stream ends where they click delete. >> They believe the evidence vanishes with their anger. >> But AM herself in a moment of ironic foreshadowing captured the transcript states, "Nobody's ever really anonymous. >> I don't see them." >> Psyche's community proved her right. There is a moment detailed in the
sources where a caller dials into Psyche's show and explains exactly how they countered AM's attempts to hide her digital footprint. >> And how do they do it? >> The caller wasn't just taking screenshots. They were using automated background recording software. The caller explains that the software automatically detects when a specific channel goes live, begins recording silently even while the caller is
asleep, and automatically saves the video file when the stream ends. They removed the human element of monitoring and turn surveillance into an automated defense system. >> They specifically used this software to capture AM's deleted broadcasts. The sources note these were late night streams where she was allegedly intoxicated. Her inhibitions were entirely gone and she was making the
most explicit violent threats and doxing attempts. >> She would wake up, sober up, delete the videos to hide the evidence and think >> But the community had already captured she was safe. every single frame. What the community was doing was compiling what we can call a public ledger of intent. >> A public ledger of intent. I love that phrasing. Let's break down the mechanics of why that ledger is so powerful.
>> Think about it like auditing a financial institution or building a credit score. If you look at a single isolated transaction, say someone spending $10, it doesn't tell you much. >> In legal terms, context and patterns are everything. >> Exactly. If an aggressor makes a single angry comment on a live stream, law enforcement or a judge might dismiss it as venting, hyperbole, or protected
speech. >> But when you build a ledger, when you compile dozens of deleted streams, when you meticulously clip the specific violent rhetoric, when you timestamp the doxing of family members, when you isolate the explicit calls to action directing followers to contact local police, you are no longer presenting an isolated incident. You are presenting an
undeniable chronological pattern of criminal intimidation and harassment. You are building a dossier. >> By meticulously archiving this data, the targeted individual completely shifts the power dynamic. >> They transition from being a helpless victim waiting for the next blow to a legally armed citizen possessing actionable, undeniable evidence of malicious intent. >> And the endgame of compiling that ledger
is taking it straight out of the digital realm and into the physical justice system. The goal is to take that flash drive full of recorded streams straight to local law enforcement. >> If you know you are being targeted by a swatting campaign, the most effective defense is preeemption. >> You go to your local police precinct, you hand them the ledger, you show them
the organized plan to file false reports against your address. By establishing that pattern beforehand, if a call does come in claiming there are hostages or illegal substances at your home, the police already have the context. You neutralize the weaponized state response. It is the ultimate shield against proximity attacks. But the reality of having to execute this
strategy forces us to confront the environment we have built. >> I am going to be honest. Looking at your own digital footprint and realizing that to survive online, you have to act like an intelligence agency. It feels incredibly dystopian. >> Let's unpack why it feels dystopian. Because historically, recording people without their knowledge, tracking their movements, and building dossas felt like the work of espionage agents.
>> It feels dirty. >> We want to believe that our communities, even our online ones, are built on trust. >> Exactly. The idea that to just participate in these communities, to have friends, to share a live stream, you have to run automated surveillance software on people you used to bond with just in case they decide to turn on you and orchestrate a siege against your family. It is a remarkably bleak
baseline for human interaction. >> It is undeniably bleak, but it is the unvarnished reality of the current digital landscape. >> We have handed humanity tools of unprecedented connective power. And that power is entirely neutral. The exact same infrastructure that allows you to find comfort in a stranger who also lost
their father in hospice is the infrastructure that I just home address a year later. In a world where the boundary between the screen and your physical safety is so easily shattered, relying on the >> Okay, I'm just reading. This is just the text message I'm getting so you can hear. It says, "Looer End your life, End your life, Or
else keep Alex and beat his name out your AIDS ridden mouth, stalker freak. You're disgusting. Tell the cops you're GHB. You tried to grape Alex. You're sick, stupid, gay bitch." And then there's pictures of like someone with a red balloon and there's some and it says you have AIDS. Okay. Um this is live. This is live right now. Yeah. And so
that's what they're texting me. And they I think they have pictures of raging demon with a red balloon. And they have some pictures of people I don't know. Um Yeah. And this is live. This is I'm receiving these live. Yeah. This is a live. And I'm receiving these text messages and phone calls harassing live on the air. And it says I have AIDS. And there's more pictures of like I guess this is raging demon with a red balloon
or something like that. I don't know, you know, raging demon, I'm sorry. They're using your photo with the red balloon. Okay, but just so you can hear that those are the messages I'm getting right now. Okay, we can continue with the analysis. Um, and it's almost over. It's only 2 minutes left. >> The goodwill of the crowd is a fatal error.
>> Passive existence is a vulnerability. Documented, meticulous evidence is your only true defense. >> So, what does this all mean? We have gone on an incredibly dark and complex journey today. We started with a conflict over a microphone and some cash app donations. A dispute ignited by the raw volatile energy of unresolved grief. We watched that initial spark get fed
into the machinery of an online echo chamber where a nurse and a grandmother sat idly by captured by an audience while pseudo legal justifications validated violent ideiation and swatting. >> We examined the profound psychological devastation inflicted on a target who had to watch a sacred shared trauma be weaponized against his own family. And finally, we looked at the dystopian yet
absolute necessity of arming oneself with digital evidence modern internet. It says >> fundamentally underscores that the internet is no longer a separate secondary reality. >> It says typed into a chat box or spoken into a webcam manifest directly at your front door. >> Oh, I'm going to be going to the police and the nervous family members. >> And that leaves us with a final thought
I want you sitting out there listening to this to deeply consider. Look at your own digital footprint right now. Think about the personal details you've shared, the locations you've tagged, the vulnerabilities you've expressed to an online audience. The internet was originally architected to connect us. It was designed so we could share our lives, share our grief, and find community.
>> But as we've seen in terrifying detail today, the very tools of connection have become the most efficient weapons of targeted destruction. >> I'm saying built and willingly moved into a digital panopticon. >> We absolutely have. In a world where a camera in your bedroom can instantaneously broadcast your deepest pain to a jury of anonymous strangers looking for entertainment, what does it
truly mean to have a private life anymore? >> Where does your sanctuary begin? And where does the public stage end? >> And I want you to ask yourself this. If the mob, for whatever unpredictable reason, turns its eye on you tomorrow, do you have the receipts? Are your digital defenses ready? >> Oh, they're ready. They're ready. I'm ready for this. And that thank God for Karen, you know. Thank God for Karen.
Everyone has things to say about INX. Thank God. Thank God she got me. She got me that uh that the recording of it. So, you know, thank you. You know, anyone has a problem with her, you got a problem with me because um
she protected me. Nobody else was. What happened? Well, we're just going over the legally actionable threats of the target harassment, the um threat of swatting, the threat of physical violence. Um you can go back to if you want to hear the live transcript um or the live uh recording when it happened, go you can go back a few days. It's just it's a
picture with uh the Christine and Alexander Mayor's um you know, AI of them. Um but yeah, you can hear the entire um the um recording of the show where all these threats were made, but there's a lot more. Yeah, he is. He is. He is. Anyhow, um yeah. So, anyone want to come up and have a chat before I go to the police station today, which I will be
going very shortly. I think they open at 8:00 a.m. It's 6:00 a.m. right now. Um open and shut. I mean, it's like they're right there saying it. Um RG is saying to give me AIDS. Um Christina is saying there will be no karma for it and um
there'll be no legal repercussions for it. And there are threats of physical violence doxing um proximity abuse. I mean all wow. I mean it's wow. Wow. It got handed to me in a gift wrap package.
I mean, that's how brazen and I guess stupid these people are. Okay, here we go. And just like I've been getting these um messages all morning. Let me see. I mean, I've read them. They're so sick. Absolutely sick. Can read it again. What does it say? I've been getting them all day and phone calls hanging up. I will read them again. I can't show if there's any pictures of people and stuff like that
that I don't know. But it says it says AI is saying, "Imagine being a desperate seeking validation online like a bitch." And then it says, um, "Stop snitching, you F A. You better not. You ain't going anywhere but to an AIDS clinic. you, You threatened to, um, blank Alex. Show that to the police. Stop sexually harassing
beta and minors. Show that to the police, you rapist freak. You lose nigg sucker." Okay. Um, yeah. I'm going to drop a Jewish nuke on you, boy. Stop sexually harassing beta and minors. You have AIDS. Um, loser End your live, Or else keep Alex and beat his
name out your AIDS ridden mouth stalker freak. You're disgusting. Tell the cops you're GHB. You tried to grape Alex. You're sick, stupid gay Yeah. Oh, yes. You have AIDS. Yes. Yep. Oh. Oh, they are. Oh, yeah. They're all They're all saved. They're all saved. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. >> Mhm.
May take your channel down just for the fun of I played softball with you before. I have people in your area and it's onsite. You're going to get hurt. Welcome to the big boy club. John may take your channel just for the fun of it. Okay, these are text messages I'm receiving. Um, oh, look. It's Psyche the Cat Killer. Beta owns you. Karen owned brother hates her and she has no real life friends. Game on, Psyche. You haven't seen anything yet. I will
destroy you. I'll start by applying pressure on your family.
Yeah. Yeah. And I gave the numbers that were um harassed me last night. They go to voicemail. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Reporting. Um Okay. It says Okay, then there's Here's the ones from last night. It says I'll read them all. There's about a hundred of them. One second. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. The Jewish
demons. Hold on. I'm getting new ones right now. The Jewish demons will kill you. The Jewish de demons will kill you. Okay. Hold on a second. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Um, yeah, I'm not replying. I mean, it's like um I can't I mean, they're not real phone number. I mean, they're just um
text now numbers harassing me from these reporting my name for be okay. So, it says I'm going to read what they say though, just a document on the show. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. 50-year-old bum. Um flagged meth addict. U John son of blank. Get a job. A job.
Get a job. Get a job junkie. Get a job. Son of blank. I'm telling the FBI about you swatting kids. You effing PEDF sick Son of Judy belongs in federal prison for loving PDF. You're getting a thread on Kiwi Farms. You'll be documented there forever. Um Kiwi Farms local scammer meth addict groomer. Welcome to Kiwi Farms. Uh Blank and
Blank will be documented there as well. You sick You've been harassing Bea for too long. Leave her alone, you sicko. Leave her alone, You're so short, short and frail and old. The crack you smoke has made you so weak. Kiwi Farms will document your whole family there. You love, you love that for PDF. Brandon Q, Brandon Q, the PDF is your best friend. Leave Beta
alone. F A Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. Reported your stream. John, enough. Leave beta alone or else. F A, you defend PDF. Alex was right. You aren't gay. You are a PDF. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. Get a job. Mention beta again and it's over. Shut the up. Rumor. scumbag nickn. Stop mentioning beta or
else. Son of blank. Stop. You're texting yourself for attention. L cow Welcome to Kiwi Farms. N I G E R. You're texting yourself. Attention. Tell the fat cow Karen Latimer that her old whale ass to bed. Lose weight. Karen, you're the one harassing me. Old ass 65year-old alone. Karen has a couple years left. What does she have to
show for it? Nothing. Single fat greasy. Ni g e r. Leave beta alone. Blank said she wants concrete because blank the fat is mentioning beta. Concrete for blank reported for doxing game over Karen diabetic cokehead doxing beta say good night Karen reporting my name for being a groomer.
Yeah. Oh yeah. I'm going to as soon as they open Yeah. soon as they open I will be um going to the police station this morning. Um, yeah, I know. It's pretty It's pretty shocking, right guys? You know, and so, you know, I think this is has something to do with Black RG doing the text messages. I'm 90% sure. Um, today it's
from a California number. Yesterday was West Virginia number. They put Jewish stars. They put all kinds of stuff in it. Um, call me all kinds of things. Uh, try your best not to sound twacked, but tell them how scared you are. Oh, no. I'm not twacked. I'm absolutely absolutely perfectly fine. Yeah. And um I'm not really scared. I'm just
because, you know, I have all the evidence to put these people away. So, oh, here we go. Getting some more messages. Let's see. Apparently, I'm just texting myself, but I mean, look, we can see Let's hear it. Let's hear what what are they saying now? I mean, wow. Wow. Wow. Wow. It's
revealing themselves. Um, let's see. It says, um, Karen's own brother, I played softball with you. Okay, um, you're going to get hurt. You're, um, um, Karen's own brother called her a fat, smelly, ugly son that no one loves. Okay, well, you know, you're a PDF. U, you're texting yourself fake messages. You made these text
numbers. I'm reporting you to the SCPA. You don't deserve cats. You choke cats like a ger dick. You are freak. I'm reporting to the police. You're a PDF.
You can you hear me even live? You can see my hand. My hands are definitely You saw me getting the phone calls. Yeah. They're so bored. Yeah. Yeah. They're so bored. They're sad. But yeah, it is stupid. Yeah. There's They're just so stupid. Yeah. So, it's okay. The police will see all of it. Yeah.
Hopefully they can check out. Oh, it's all true. Okay. Okay. If it's all true, we'll just see if we'll see if it's all true. Yeah, it's like teenagers. I know. It's like even worse. You know, I never experienced this harassment as bad um even in, you know, elementary school, you know, high school, junior high. Never never this bad of harassment my life. AIDS. AIDS. AIDS. AIDS. AIDS. AIDS. AIDS.
You live in a tin can and suck off. Hold on one second. AIDS. AIDS. AIDS. You have AIDS. The demons are coming for your AIDS ridden soul. Okay. Getting messages as we speak. Oh, there's pictures of Jay Dog. Um, and it's a picture of Jay Dog with the with the Bea and her her fiance. It
says, um, you're a PDF. I'm reporting you to the police. You choke cats. Um, yeah. Yeah. The demons are coming for my aids ridden soul. You're a 6inch tall PDF. You live in a tin can and suck off AIDS ridden Jews. The demons are coming for your aids ridden soul.
You're a 6inch tall groomer. Okay. I'm a six I'm 6 inches tall apparently guys. Image your PDF. Yeah. What is the SCPA?
You mean the S ASPCA? Are they trying to say? I don't know. You have AIDS. You have AIDS. You have AIDS. AIDS. AIDS. AIDS. AIDS. AIDS. AIDS. AIDS. I know. It's Gosh. Wow. I know. It's like it's like I feel like I'm getting the red carpet into hell. I mean, it's like I mean, these these
people are just, you know, just there's it's helling themselves. Wow. Wow. And it's really funny, you know, the event of a Here we go. bag. Okay. It says, um, here we go. Your aids n I g e r mudborne f a. Okay.
It's a picture of like, you know, how to like lucky Luciano. It says, "You're already in hell." Okay. So, this is live. You know, this is live. They think I'm texting myself. Yeah, this is this is live. I'm already in hell. Well, you're Listen, if I'm in hell, I have a throne there at least. You know, you're being tortured there,
Steve. You're going to be in trouble. Shout out to Jod, it says. Okay, Jody. I don't know who Jod is, but yeah. So, just so you can see exactly um what's going on with these people. um just documenting it for my protection
and safety. If anything happens to me, you know where to go. Uh I guess Alexander Mayor's um um you know is the source of this as well as Black RG and Christine and Beta. Okay, so we know exactly who's behind it. Um they will all be being reported today. Oh, here we go. Oh, you're going
to get more text messages. Okay, let's see. What does it say now? What does it say now?
Um, it says, um, it says, "My mom blanks blanks dict for $2." Okay. My mom sucks dick for milk money. Go yourself and stick a pogo stick up your ass, you aid infected nicknog. Um,
no one crazes. Well, 47 people in chat. Looks like some people crate.
Oh yeah, we have pictures of Beeta and Sam man and uh here you see them here. Here these are great.
Behold. Behold your heroes. Your heroes. Your favorite streamers. That's who you're talking to. Okay. Behold. Behold. Behold. Behold. That's who you're talking to. Monsters. Literal monsters. Demons.
Leave beta alone. Did I name my Oh god. Yeah, I got to start because I got to document right now the um you know beta is live. Thank you. Shout out Trip and Sip for documenting all this for me. I appreciate you too,
dude. You are awesome. Really appreciate that. I'm very happy that you are documenting all of this. Yep. Yep. Yep. So, let me see. Trip um panel verse bods. You can see all these deleted streams except for I'm trying to I'm
trying to get him to put up um the IRL news ones as well. If I can reach Trip and Sip, I'd love him to start um documenting those because there are criminal threats um threats of um misusing the legal system, doxing. Uh let's see. Okay. Yeah. Okay. Let's see. Oh, here's the
kid. Keep reaching. You are still the fool. So, let's like I'm going to have this stream analyzed now. This is beta's 4hour stream where Alexandra appeared on it for few hours. I just put this into my analysis machine. Okay. I mean, this is great. This is so good. I love having all this just documented because these
people delete their streams, you know. Um, and if they uh so uh I'm just so happy that I have all this documented. Thank you so much, Trip and S. I appreciate that. Thank you to Karen also. You know, you are awesome. Thank you so much.
So, let's see. I'm just going to look at mentions of psyche and Okay. Okay. There we go. Okay. And yes, got this one up. Okay. Perfect. Perfect. Perfect. I can create
a video about this, too. Okay. Oh, perfect. Perfect. Perfect. It's It's generating already. This is so great. I love technology, guys. It makes things so much easier for me. Okay. Threats to psyche
and other streamers. Let's make a video about this. Okay, I'm going to start this one. Generating this as we go. Okay, this is this makes it so easy. I I just love the software. Shout out to um Google LM, Notebook LM. Uh let's see. I'll just create a radio
show for it. Let's do a radio show. Um long and we can look at threats to psyche
and other streamers because they went on a whole they and nobody was allowed to defend themselves either while these while these were these uh threads were being made. So, these are being generated. Oh my gosh, this makes it so much easier for me. Just put it in a little package. I can also make a infographic with these
threats. Okay, perfect, perfect, perfect. This is great. I love this. Okay, threats to Psyche and other streamers. And we can have a look at this in a minute because this will um generate pretty fast to psyche.
Okay. Okay. There we go. You know, Vita was going to do a cute little stream making fun of me and you know, but he turns into a legally actionable um physically scared of her. What if she has a weapon? What if she has a gun?
What? They're trying to distract and shift the blame to others. It's Black RG. Yeah, I know it's black RG, but I have her I have her um threatening swatting and physical violence towards me as well. I'm so tarded it's hilarious. Okay, you can think that. Go ahead. I'm tarted and you're sitting here at 6:00 in the
morning harassing somebody, calling their phone number on under several things, talking about the Jews and um sending pictures of, you know, um yeah, check out um Kennel Kickers. Just go look up kennel kickers on Kiwi Farms. Um it documents the whole thing. You you'll see the full um true story of you know
um what's his name? Um you know Tony the conductor. You'll see Black RG there. Uh all in on Kiwi Farms. Thank you. Shout out Kiwi Farms for documenting these lunatics who are the Kiwi Farms finds them disgusting, you know.
So yeah. Okay. Let's see what Let's see. Is the is the infographic ready yet? Let me see. So, this is from the beatas kitties. Okay. Let me see how many things. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. They're all generating. So, we'll get those in a second if anyone wants to come up. I mean, don't be afraid. Yeah. Um I think if he's stuck to the jab, he'll have a decent shot. What does that mean? I don't understand that. What that
means. Okay. Yeah. I'm not going to fight Alex. Yes, I'm scared of her. I guess I am um afraid because she can have a gun. She can She She knows my address. She can show up. She can kill me. Um, she thinks that it's okay. Yeah. So, there you go. There you go. Chibi Chibi, you get to see you call me cat abuser, but but you know, these are
these are human being abusers, you know? Right. Okay.
I didn't say beta was live. I said beta. I have Beta's Live, which I'm analyzing right now. And VA is not live. Beta was live yesterday with Alexander Mayers. Okay. So, I'm going to download this. Uh, let's have a look at what happened on Beta's show yesterday, though. I can bring it right up. Here we go. And here we go. Here we go. Yep. Steve is going too far, isn't he? Isn't he? Well, especially when he said he's
going to give me AIDS. We have that on tape. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Okay. So, let's go to downloads and let's look at this uh infographic. How about this? Let's I want to have a look at this. Okay, here we go. This was on beat as yesterday. Let's see what we Oh, here we go. This is the Let's see what we have here. Let me just put this on full screen.
Okay, we have Crystalan acts as a moderator, facilitator of comp through the crystal verse. Okay, there's me involved in direct monitoring and naming of streamers referencing fellow creators. Okay. Um, beta central figure using aggressive VOD titles to label opponents, signaling an active stance in disputes. Keep reaching. You're still a fool. Yep. And I'm evil, right? Creators use BOD titles as primary tool for
insults, employing emojis to mock or devalue targets. Okay. Cross channel monitoring. Uh the crystal. Okay. Okay. So, anyway, is the is this big? Um yeah, big tall sexy Rob. It sounds like him. Yeah. There it is. Psyche always loses. Okay. We'll see. We'll see if I lose the
court case. We'll see. We will just see. Wow. So lame. Hold on a second. Where am I? There I am. Okay, we'll just see. We'll just see. Okay, let's see what else is coming
through my text messages. Let's see. Let's have a look what um big ugly RG is up to. Let me see.
Okay, it says messages. Okay, it says it says um Okay, it says Okay, here we go. It says you're an MIG AIDS nigg Mudborn. Okay, then it says ain't no 401k for evil. Retire to the
fire f a monster and a rap a pist. You act like a psychic to lure ks to your channel. You used to like Russian uh kid videos on Tik Tok. We don't forget. all fake threats. If you snitch, I'm gonna you with a lawn mower. Alex is gonna kl you and get off. Your dad is
sucking bald ni ger monkey dick in hell. Kenn kennel kickers is dismantled. Now we're psych psychos. Your dad is sucking bald ni ger monkey dick in hell several times. You act like a psychic to lure kids to channel. You used to uh like Russian uh kid videos on Tik Tok. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. If you Well, if you didn't hear Yeah. My family can't afford attorneys. Yeah, we can. If you didn't hear um on the doxing videos, um we can very well afford attorneys and we will mop your asses up. Hi, Lola. Hi, baby. Hi Lola. Hi Lola.
Let's see what else is there saying now. My family want nothing to do with me. Well, you're absolutely wrong. I was talking to my mom right just last night about this about going to the police today and she is very Yeah, I don't know. This is just all this kind of crap. They're just ain't no 401k for evil and then they're psychic psychos. Well, the FBI was very interested in the
kennel kickers. Now the FBI will be interested in the Psyche Psychos, and the FBI will be looking into this. Um, okay. Yeah. I mean, I Yeah, I got I got it. I got I got all these messages. Got it. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. It says a 6 inch tall dad sucker. Okay. They have a form for law enforcement. Yes. And they give up the information.
Super easy. Yes, I will be getting that. They will they have the exact Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I'll be contacting text down today, contacting the police today. So,
so nobody wants to come up. I know people are scared. Um, you know, I'm not scared. You know, take it from me. Be brave. They they they operate on fear, right? And so it's like I'm not afraid at all. Actually, I feel very protected, especially now that they've just
revealed themselves. They fell right into the trap. Congratulations. You're so dumb. You're so dumb. And guys, don't forget, Psyche always wins. Have a nice day.
↑↓ navigate · Enter seek · Click to select
